gnomi: (grammar_crisis_room (wanderingbastet ))
[personal profile] gnomi
Random Monday Morning Punctuation Poll

[Poll #818473]

Date: 2006-09-11 03:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mabfan.livejournal.com
Thoughts often go in italics.

Date: 2006-09-11 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kuroshii.livejournal.com
my thought exactly. :)

Re: apropos of nothing

Date: 2006-09-13 05:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tikvah.livejournal.com
I only gank the best. ;-)

I just wish I knew who deserves credit for that icon.

Date: 2006-09-11 04:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jenwrites.livejournal.com
I was gonna write this, but I thought Hmm, I'd better check to see if someone else has already posted it and then just second it.

Date: 2006-09-11 06:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jenwrites.livejournal.com
What do I win? What do I win?

Date: 2006-09-11 06:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnomi.livejournal.com
::hands you a cookie::

Date: 2006-09-11 06:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jenwrites.livejournal.com
*happy munching sounds*

Date: 2006-09-11 05:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xochitl42.livejournal.com
Yep, that's what I'd do. :)

Date: 2006-09-11 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byrne.livejournal.com
I never use the thought as dialogue construct. It's a minefield that is easy to avoid. Instead, I would use something like:

"I don't know," he lied, hiding the fact that he really did know but had no intention of sharing that fact.

(Edit for context and character, of course.)

Date: 2006-09-11 04:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tygerseye.livejournal.com
Yes yes me too me too. (Note the complete lack of commas because I hate sentences with as many commas as there are WORDS. Ugh.)

Unless it's first person POV, and then I sometimes use the 'I thought' thing, but with no punctuation at all.

But really, I am a clueless punctuation dork, so the better answer is "I don't know, whatever my editor (or brain, my geeky co-writer) says I should use..." LOL

Date: 2006-09-11 08:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnomi.livejournal.com
::procures [personal profile] tygerseye some commas::

How do you feel about "Yes, yes; me, too, me, too"?

Date: 2006-09-11 08:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tygerseye.livejournal.com
But I don't want commas! *whine and pout*

That is really, really, really ugly. Not as ugly as "Yes, yes, me, too, me, too." But really damn close. LOL

Date: 2006-09-11 08:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnomi.livejournal.com
Heh.

See, my gut instinct would be to recast it. Because I would insist on all that pumctuation there. So recasting -- "Yes," said so-and-so. "Me, too." -- is the best solution I can come up with off the top of my head. Still lots of punctuation, but varied.

Date: 2006-09-11 08:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tygerseye.livejournal.com
I would do that, too. But I would break it up even further...

"Yes." So and so walked over to the whatchamacallit and picked up a thingamabob. "Me, too."

;-)

Date: 2006-09-11 03:50 pm (UTC)
ext_2233: Writing MamaDeb (Default)
From: [identity profile] mamadeb.livejournal.com
I don't actually use attributions for speech or thought, but in US English, single quotes are proper. So there. :)

Date: 2006-09-11 05:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnomi.livejournal.com
in US English, single quotes are proper. So there. :)

Do you have a definitive source on this? All sources I'm finding indicate that it's a stylistic choice, and none of the choices are any more proper than any other.

Date: 2006-09-11 04:07 pm (UTC)
jencallisto: photo of my back as I'm twirling, white lace skirt and long dark hair flying (Default)
From: [personal profile] jencallisto
I don't think I have a standard method for expressing thoughts, as it hasn't come up very often in my (mostly non-fiction) writing. I instinctively prefer the no-punctuation option, but I also suspect I might go back in later and add the double quotation marks if I feel that the sentence needs it for clarity. I like the idea of using italics.

i have, on occasion, used no-one, but i think i more often use no one.

Date: 2006-09-11 04:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xiphias.livejournal.com
"I don't know," he said. I know, but I'm not telling you, he thought.

Date: 2006-09-11 06:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] quarkwiz.livejournal.com
Yes, that's exactly what I would have chosen.

Date: 2006-09-11 04:15 pm (UTC)
ext_87516: (Default)
From: [identity profile] 530nm330hz.livejournal.com
I, too, vote for italics for thoughts

Date: 2006-09-11 08:25 pm (UTC)
madfilkentist: My cat Florestan (gray shorthair) (Default)
From: [personal profile] madfilkentist
I'd use italics for thoughts; but in a medium in which italics aren't available, such as unformatted text, I'd use quotes.

Date: 2006-09-11 04:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] csbermack.livejournal.com
I'm with the italic people for thoughts. I think. I apparently don't use that construction, because I had no instant response for How It Ought To Be.

Also, I never use no one, although if I did use no one, I'd use no one. noone seems clearly wrong, and no-one bothers me. I would give it to nobody, even in a parallel construction with anyone.

Date: 2006-09-12 02:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tapuz.livejournal.com
Having now read through the comments, I agree with this on both counts.

Date: 2006-09-11 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michelel72.livejournal.com
I almost always use italics for thoughts. I will occasionally integrate thoughts into the text if the text is very character-POV, but never if I'm also including the term he thought.

"Noone" always makes me think of an olde-tyme shootout: We'll meet at high noone in front of the Olde Worlde Sweete Shoppe. No one I know would hyphenate it, either. Is that another olde-tyme thing? I saw no-one to-day when I went to buy a new writing-quill.

Date: 2006-09-11 06:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnomi.livejournal.com
No-one appears to be a BrE thing. Alas, none of the BrE native speakers on my friends list have weighed in yet.

I vacilate between "noone" and "no one," since both look wrong to me.

Date: 2006-09-11 06:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michelel72.livejournal.com
Just looking at your example, I didn't give it to anyone seems a more typical AmEnglish construction than I gave it to no one does, even though the latter version is less ambiguous. I don't know the text you're actually working with, of course, but maybe that difference is why the objective no one looks odd to you? That may also be why [livejournal.com profile] cshiley above would instead use nobody.

It's a theory. But the tone of the text would of course be a major consideration.

Date: 2006-09-11 09:33 pm (UTC)
ext_3319: Goth girl outfit (Muffinatrix -- angeldess)
From: [identity profile] rikibeth.livejournal.com
I like the italics, but if that weren't an option, I'd go with the single quotes.

Monday morning meetings must include not only coffee but MUFFINS. I know, because I'm tne one who has to BAKE the muffins.

Date: 2006-09-12 12:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnomi.livejournal.com
Muffins are a most excellent addition for Monday morning meetings.

sortof-almost OT question

Date: 2006-09-11 10:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kuroshii.livejournal.com
hey, it's a grammar post so it's not completely off topic!

my RL friend [livejournal.com profile] aboxofeyes does copyediting. she is now wondering:
"I was putting this off for no particular reason, but now I find I really do need a good British English reference book, ideally the UK equivalent of the Chicago Manual of Style."

i thought that either you or someone on your FL might be able to help reccommend something for her. (pleez? thanks!)

Re: sortof-almost OT question

Date: 2006-09-12 12:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnomi.livejournal.com
Oh, good question.

I think I shall post it as a new post, so that people who don't read all the way down the comments see the question.

Re: sortof-almost OT question

Date: 2006-09-12 05:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kuroshii.livejournal.com
oo! thank you! and i'll tell her too. :)

Date: 2006-09-12 01:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seborn.livejournal.com
Oh dear. There was a Monday morning meeting?

Date: 2006-09-12 01:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnomi.livejournal.com
Actually, no. It was a long-ago-scheduled Monday morning meeting that didn't actually happen.

Fear not.

Date: 2006-09-12 05:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] michelel72.livejournal.com
You could have had a Monday morning meeting that was vaguely proposed on Friday afternoon, that would start half an hour before your normal workday, that would be at a location an hour away from your normal Monday morning workplace (a little place I like to call "home"), and that was confirmed via workplace email over the weekend. (Fortunately I noticed an escape clause in the confirmation email. Still, annoying.) So I remain firmly in the "better when canceled" camp. (Except for a nagging desire to spell that as cancelled, apparently because I read too many British novels in my childhood ....)

other

Date: 2006-09-12 03:27 am (UTC)
cellio: (writing)
From: [personal profile] cellio
Italics when available; parentheses when confined to ASCII. And punctuation that isn't part of the quote outside of the closing quote; you might have Strunk and White on your side but I have pedantry on mine. :-)

Date: 2006-09-12 06:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zsero.livejournal.com
punctuation that isn't part of the quote outside of the closing quote;

Yes, exactly. That's what I was going to say.

Date: 2006-09-12 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lisafeld.livejournal.com
I use italics for thought...

August 2015

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30 31     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 4th, 2026 05:30 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios