Another Peek Into How My Brain Works
Feb. 9th, 2009 12:36 pmSo, sometime over the weekend (well, some time after Thursday night, because I work from home on Fridays), the office building I work in changed the (relatively new and perfectly good) faucets in the bathroom to the automatic ones that are sensor-driven. I saw them this morning, and my thought process went something like this:
1. Oh, they did something new with the faucets.
2. Oh! They installed those automatic ones!
3. Yikes... that's going to be a Shabbat problem.
4. Oh, wait... silly, you don't work here on Shabbat.
1. Oh, they did something new with the faucets.
2. Oh! They installed those automatic ones!
3. Yikes... that's going to be a Shabbat problem.
4. Oh, wait... silly, you don't work here on Shabbat.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 05:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 02:59 am (UTC)What is the underlying principle? And would I be correct in guessing it has multiple interpretations?
-P
no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 02:13 pm (UTC)The intermediate case is a home hot water heater. When you turn on hot water in a home with a hot water heater, new water is immediately drawn into the boiler to be heated. For this reason traditionally observant Jews will not use hot water from a tap on Shabbat. They will draw hot water from a hot pot, since no new water is added.
Some people will use hot tap water on Shabbat in a hotel in America. We can assume the majority of the people in the hotel are not Jews, and so many people are turning the taps on and off at any given moment that the direct connection between your turning on the tap and water getting heated is not apparent. Others are more stringent.
And yes, there is lots of dispute over the details.
The underlying principle is something called gramma - indirect action. This is too big a topic to go into here. The classic example of gramma in the talmud is as follows: Putting out a fire on Shabbat is forbidden. What do you do if something catches on fire? One possibility is to take water barrels and put them in a circle beyond where the fire is presently burning. When the fire reaches the barrels, it will burn them and the water will spill out and extinguish the fire(*). This is considered indirect extinguishing. On the other hand, pouring water onto an incline and letting it roll down onto the fire is considered direct action and is forbidden.
(*)Kids, don't try this at home!
no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 06:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 09:24 pm (UTC)3 mile walk to shul. Ouch!
no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 09:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 10:11 pm (UTC)Looking forward to seeing Larry this weekend.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 10:18 pm (UTC)May you both have a great time at Boskone.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 12:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 12:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 03:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 06:36 pm (UTC)(Yeah, "dispensed" was not my first word choice there, but then I reread my original comment.)
no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-05 10:43 pm (UTC)I can sometimes fool the sensor-toilets in hotels into not flushing.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-08 02:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-09 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 12:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 01:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-10 04:28 am (UTC)