gnomi: (p_h)
[personal profile] gnomi
I am here to speak out in protection of the word "fulsome."

The American Heritage Dictionary (4th edition, 2001) defines fulsome as:

adj.Offensively flattering or insincere. See Syns. at unctuous. [ME fulsom, abundant, disgusting]


However, I keep seeing it used as a synonym for "abundant," presumably based on false association with "full." And it is time to stand up for fulsome in its original meaning. Thus, no more fulsome praise...unless you really mean that the praise is offensive or insincere.

I, and my fellow vocabulary pedants, thank you.

Date: 2006-03-03 10:17 pm (UTC)
dpolicar: (Default)
From: [personal profile] dpolicar
Funny. I always understood "fulsome praise" to mean lathering it on with a trowel... ie, offensively flattering.

Date: 2006-03-03 11:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kuroshii.livejournal.com
yes, but you don't get up to the podium and thank people for it.

like george plimpton did, once. shortly after which he learned the correct meaning of the word, and realised why they had so suddenly gotten quiet.

Date: 2006-03-03 10:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kay-derwydd.livejournal.com
Aside from automatically thinking of Fulsom Prison, that was what I always understood, too. LOL

Date: 2006-03-04 02:01 pm (UTC)
madfilkentist: My cat Florestan (gray shorthair) (Default)
From: [personal profile] madfilkentist
That's Folsom Prison.

Date: 2006-03-04 03:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kay-derwydd.livejournal.com
*chuckles* I had a feeling I spelled that wrong. *blushes* Thank ya. LOL

Date: 2006-03-03 10:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byrne.livejournal.com
*cringe* Did I do that? *hides*

Date: 2006-03-03 11:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byrne.livejournal.com
She's editing the Victorian, so it's highly possible. *hides more*

Date: 2006-03-03 11:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tygerseye.livejournal.com
eek? *lick*

Date: 2006-03-03 11:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byrne.livejournal.com
Oh and *germ free snog*

Date: 2006-03-03 11:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tygerseye.livejournal.com
*snuggles* I need all the snogs I can get this weekend. :( :(

Date: 2006-03-04 12:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] byrne.livejournal.com
I know. :((((

*hugs you so very very tight*

:(((((((

Date: 2006-03-04 11:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gnomi.livejournal.com
No, not you.

What prompted this post was a story I was just randomly reading for pleasure. Fear not; I haven't found anything eggregious in AGA.

Date: 2006-03-03 11:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tygerseye.livejournal.com
Mmmmm. Geekitude is so sexy. :D

Date: 2006-03-04 01:16 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] cheshyre
Any chance you could address "enormity" next, or is it too late?

Date: 2006-03-06 03:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estherchaya.livejournal.com
It's really probably too late.

C'mon, people think "irregardless" is a word. Do you really think they're going to understand fulsome and enormity?

Date: 2006-03-04 03:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cramerica.livejournal.com
I always associated fulsome with a sickeningly sweet smell...

As Long As You're Standing Up . . .

Date: 2006-03-04 03:43 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
On the subject of vocabulary abuse, what is to be done about the growing number of people who use "literally" to mean "figuratively"? They must be stopped.

The other night, I heard Bob Schieffer of CBS News describe how Sen. John McCain was having yet another dispute with the Bush Administration by saying that the senator "literally exploded." That left me wondering: Did the explosion leave the walls of some Senate hearing room spattered with blood and gore, or was the heat of the blast so intense that it reduced the senator's remains to a mere dusting of ash?


STEVE O.

Date: 2006-03-04 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ianrandalstrock.livejournal.com
I'm in. No more misuse of fulsome... other than to heap fulsome praise on those who it to mean a lot.

And may I put forward my ongoing search for a new, good word? Decimate means to reduce by one-tenth, but it is so often used to mean "nearly totally destroy" that it is weakening. I've been searching long (but not too hard) for a word that means "to reduce by ninety percent", almost the inverse of decimate, but haven't yet found one I like.

Date: 2006-03-05 05:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] merlinpole.livejournal.com
"virtually annihilate" perhaps, or "nearly annihilated."

Date: 2006-03-05 09:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ianrandalstrock.livejournal.com
Yeah, but that doesn't have the pizzazz of a single word, le mot juste. It feels like a fix-up.

Date: 2006-03-05 05:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] merlinpole.livejournal.com
The misuse of "factoid" annoys me.... I think it was Norman Mailer who invented the term, to denote something which is not true, but which people tend to perceive as true. The use that paraliterate journalists put it to, to denote something that is true but it not a big deal, is just so wrong/inaccurate/inappropriate....

Date: 2006-03-06 03:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] estherchaya.livejournal.com
Count me in, too!

August 2015

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30 31     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 09:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios