Rambly Bits! Now With Fewer Additives!
Jul. 16th, 2004 10:02 am-- It occurred to me that I'm getting many more comments on posts from women than from men. So I decided to do an analysis of my friends list (not that only friends comment, but I figured there might be some sort of correlation). My friend-of list (who, I assume, read me at least once in a while) comprises: 63 women, 28 men, 10 fic journals (OK, the fic journals don't read me; they're here purely for completeness), 3 unknown.
-- I've developed a sudden interest in fanvids. Donno exactly where this came from. But if you know of good sources thereof, I'd love to be pointed there. Fandoms I follow most are West Wing, Smallville, Sports Night, and The Sentinel. Shippy, non-shippy - I don't care. But I'd prefer happy to angsty (not that I am against angsty songs/vids. I'll just save them for watching later).
-- A reminder: if you've sent me e-mail and it's bounced (or you haven't heard back from me in over a week), please check the e-mail address you're sending it to. If you're using the @theworld address, you might want to choose another option (and if you don't know any other e-mail addresses for me, ping me here and I'll send you a new e-mail address to use).
-- I discovered this week that I am not the only one who finds both chickens and moose inherently funny. That was actually a good thing to know.
-- Why is it that the T has added new, spiffy, handicapped-accessible buses to the 66 line and simultaneously rerouted the end of the to-Harvard trip to end at the non-accessible entrance to Harvard station? What were they thinking?
-- And speaking of the new buses, I'm still deciding if I like them or not. They seem to have taken away leg room and maneuverability in the aisle, but I like the proliferation of lower hanging straps (so I don't have to stand on my tiptoes to hang on) and the lack of entry steps.
-- *CHOMP!*
-- I've developed a sudden interest in fanvids. Donno exactly where this came from. But if you know of good sources thereof, I'd love to be pointed there. Fandoms I follow most are West Wing, Smallville, Sports Night, and The Sentinel. Shippy, non-shippy - I don't care. But I'd prefer happy to angsty (not that I am against angsty songs/vids. I'll just save them for watching later).
-- A reminder: if you've sent me e-mail and it's bounced (or you haven't heard back from me in over a week), please check the e-mail address you're sending it to. If you're using the @theworld address, you might want to choose another option (and if you don't know any other e-mail addresses for me, ping me here and I'll send you a new e-mail address to use).
-- I discovered this week that I am not the only one who finds both chickens and moose inherently funny. That was actually a good thing to know.
-- Why is it that the T has added new, spiffy, handicapped-accessible buses to the 66 line and simultaneously rerouted the end of the to-Harvard trip to end at the non-accessible entrance to Harvard station? What were they thinking?
-- And speaking of the new buses, I'm still deciding if I like them or not. They seem to have taken away leg room and maneuverability in the aisle, but I like the proliferation of lower hanging straps (so I don't have to stand on my tiptoes to hang on) and the lack of entry steps.
-- *CHOMP!*
no subject
Date: 2004-07-16 07:37 am (UTC)-one more woman commenting in your journal
no subject
Date: 2004-07-18 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-16 08:02 am (UTC)Mostly Star Wars, but still fun.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-18 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-16 09:47 am (UTC)If you feel the need to restore gender balance in your commenting, I am kind of a boy, some days; I could leave you lots of comments on those days.
GNARFLE!
no subject
Date: 2004-07-18 05:39 am (UTC)The girls vs. boys thing was just an odd observation after I was wondering why certain posts got very gender-unbalanced comments when they weren't gender-specific. Just me being analytical. :-)
*SPLORFLE!*
no subject
Date: 2004-07-16 11:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-18 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-16 01:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-18 05:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-17 08:11 pm (UTC)Also, I suppose I should be doing my part to address the gender balance of your comments; I'm assuming you didn't have me down as one of the "unknown three".
no subject
Date: 2004-07-18 05:42 am (UTC)And, nope, you weren't among the "unknown three." Those three are folk who have never spoken up here and who I can't determine in any way who they are. Thanks for commenting!
no subject
Date: 2004-07-18 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-20 06:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-20 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-20 09:37 am (UTC)I used to depend on my mab at mabfan address to forward all messages to my world account. What with their aggressive spam blocking (and apparently they're also fighting off a DNS attack but not telling their customers unless you call them and show them you understand techspeak), much of the mabfan mail gets rejected, without even so much as a bounce message to the sender.
It's true that they're blocking a lot of spam, as I can see now that mab at mabfan also forwards to my gmail "net" and I catch that spam in the spam folder. But they're also blocking mail sent directly to my mab at the world address, and their system is sending people I know repeated bounce messages.
In short, the things I set up my world account for ten years ago are no longer happening. Pretty soon, I'm just going to have to give them up completely.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-20 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-21 03:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-21 10:42 pm (UTC)